tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post2577894334264469885..comments2023-07-08T14:04:20.047-05:00Comments on La Vie Catholique - The Catholic Life: The Super-Secret REAL Teachings of the Catholic ChurchStephaniehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comBlogger68125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-65170596908725626712007-04-07T08:28:00.000-05:002007-04-07T08:28:00.000-05:00>>Stephanie said... Hmm...I'm guessing you didn...>>Stephanie said...<BR/> <I>Hmm...I'm guessing you didn't read the link. I still see attempts to prove points, not listening. No listening means no discussion.</I><BR/><BR/>Such GORGEOUS boundaries, my dear! I'm so proud to know you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-74026644936269209022007-04-04T14:06:00.000-05:002007-04-04T14:06:00.000-05:00Hmm...I'm guessing you didn't read the link. I sti...Hmm...I'm guessing you didn't read the link. I still see attempts to prove points, not listening. No listening means no discussion.<BR/><BR/>Good day.Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-84068723279757947462007-04-04T13:37:00.000-05:002007-04-04T13:37:00.000-05:00Every Catholic knows they don't worship Mary but w...Every Catholic knows they don't worship Mary but what they don't know is what they are doing is worship. Most Catholics are enthralled with Marian apparitions, visionaries, "sightings", etc.. Catholic Marian doctrines and practices are not Biblically based but yet you claim that Catholics don't worship her. Dressing up her statues in silk, crown her head with real jewelry, singing praises to her as you parade after her while saying the rosary. Month of May will be full of Marian festivals at many parishes around the world all in honor of Mary. Yet you still don't see it as being worshipping. Many Catholics get excited when their rosary turns to 'gold', smell roses, see tears or blood coming from the statues eyes. Light candles underneath an image of her on a plane of glass or an underpass. <BR/><BR/>Here is a encyclical straight from the pope's own words where he used the word 'worship'. The Vatican is responsible for translating this. <BR/><BR/>18. It is therefore, a pleasure for us, a full century having passed since the Pontiff of immortal memory, Pius IX, solemnly proclaimed this singular privilege of the Virgin Mother of God, to summarize the whole doctrinal position and conclude in these words of the same Pontiff, asserting that this doctrine "vouched for in Sacred Scripture according to the interpretation of the Fathers, is handed down by them in so many of their important writings, is expressed and celebrated in so many illustrious monuments of renowned antiquity, and proposed and confirmed by the greatest and highest decision of the Church" (Bull Ineffabilis Deus), so that to pastors and faithful there is nothing <B>"more sweet, nothing dearer than to worship, venerate, invoke and praise with ardent affection the Mother of God</B> conceived without stain of original sin. (Ibidem.) <BR/><BR/>ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XII 1953<BR/><BR/>According to God He is a jealous God and doesn't take to anyone worshipping anything else but Him alone. Veneration is a form of worship which still breaks God's Commandments no matter how one want to slice the meaning of it. That's Satan's little trick. Why risk being wrong in God's eyes with the practice of Marian "devotions"?<BR/><BR/>Jesus said "Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only"<BR/><BR/>Now are you going to argue with God's Word?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-54276577965788009932007-04-03T23:24:00.000-05:002007-04-03T23:24:00.000-05:00And by the way, since you seem to be so affected b...And by the way, since you seem to be so affected by what was written in "The Glories of Mary," (which was written by St. Alphonsus de Liguori, not St. Louis de Montfort) I highly recommend the link Sara posted above. I just finished reading it, and as usual Dave Armstrong does a thorough and excellent job of explaining the Catholic faith, and showing how nothing in the book is contrary to scripture when properly understood. If you really wonder how Catholics view and understand that book, are willing to listen honestly and openly, and aren't just blindly and gleefully using it as a tool to back up the ridiculous assertion that Catholics worship Mary, and do so above God, you'll read the link.Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-49034079813947259942007-04-03T22:32:00.000-05:002007-04-03T22:32:00.000-05:00I'll repeat myself one more time...I didn't grow u...I'll repeat myself one more time...I didn't grow up Catholic, I chose to become Catholic, exactly because I started questioning my own beliefs, including every one of the points you have raised. You're asking me to do something I've already done.<BR/><BR/>Now, when you start asking questions to listen, and not to make a point, then I'll engage. <BR/><BR/>Until then, peace be with you.Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-26484913201316675332007-04-03T18:56:00.000-05:002007-04-03T18:56:00.000-05:00x-Catholic,What is your point in coming here? The...x-Catholic,<BR/><BR/>What is your point in coming here? The websites you listed in her introduction thread are widely held to be anti-Catholic. They may quote church fathers, but if they do so out of context, then they are biased. <BR/><BR/>If you were truly a cradle Catholic then you would know that we do not worship Mary. <BR/><BR/>Check out the following link:<BR/><BR/>http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2004/02/does-st-alphonsus-de-liguori-in-glories.htmlSarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06070920215647366613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-7987008064825973912007-04-03T17:47:00.000-05:002007-04-03T17:47:00.000-05:00What you don't seem to understand is that what you...What you don't seem to understand is that what you are saying is exactly how I started out...I USED to believe what you're saying, I used to claim the same things. Then I started to actually examine unbiased history rather than leaning on biased anti-Catholic sources, and that is how I ended up Catholic.<BR/><BR/><B>I was raised Catholic and practiced Catholicism faithfully for many moons. Never once questioned it's teachings or practices but believed in it 100%. Since I was surrounded by the Catholic culture since my infancy I have a solid knowledge of what it means to be Catholic. It was in my blood. <BR/><BR/>Just because you studied Catholicism from unbiased resources does not mean it's God's truth. Shouldn't that be more important to you is to find out what God's truth is? What better way then through the Bible. The Bible warns of ravenous wolves entering even in the new church. Acts 20: 29 "I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. 30 Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them. 31 So be on your guard!"<BR/><BR/>You may think the websites I gave are anti-Catholic. A nice tag to slap on something to discredit it without even checking it's sources. If you are secure in your religious faith then investigate it's claims and see if they are lying about Catholicism. I, as a former Catholic,can acknowledge what Catholics believe and I know these former Catholics are not lying. There are many former Catholics around the world would agree that it's been their experiences as well. As you will see these "biased" website give references from unbiased Catholic sources and they provide the links to these sites to be checked out.<BR/></B><BR/><BR/> So forgive me if I don't fall over in shock when I hear the same old anti-Catholic misconceptions I once believed myself being spouted from yet another person.<BR/><BR/><B> No I don't expect you to "fall over in shock" because I know Satan has blinded you. I was the same too when I defended the One True Faith. The Gospel made no sense to me that is until sometime after I left. When someone explained what Christ did on the Cross for sinners a tremendous relief fell over me. All those years as a Catholic going about trying to figure what more did I need to do to make it into Heaven. I was overwhelmed by the process of figuring out what I needed to do for my salvation. Oh boy, the Indulgences was a headache trying to understand how, when or where I can obtain one. Plus, you have to do them right and if you did do them right you never know if it's acceptable to God anyway.Do you seriously believe that this came from God and not from man's traditions? You can not guarantee it No, Thank you. Christ's Blood purifies us from all sin. No need for purgatory to purify our souls since God says He remembers them no more. I take God's Word for what I need to know about my salvation.</B><BR/><BR/>When you can respectfully and accurately explain what the Church actually teaches and why you disagree instead of leaning on straw men, then I might seriously consider taking the time to explain my POV. Until then, all I see is another anti-Catholic asking questions to prove a point, not to actually hear the answer, unwilling to deal with reality, and desperately clinging to biased misinformation and hatred for the Church. <BR/><BR/><B>The jokes you were making I was addressing that there are some truth to them. I gave you some references as the Glories of Mary. A very blasphemous book that elevates Mary to equal diety status. Read it for yourself and you can read it on-line if you do not have the book. Again, Mary worship (yes Popes have used the word worship in reference to Mary..this is proven on the Vatican website. If interested I can get the encyclical) I can also get you Catholic sources on the papacy giving sorbid history of Popes gone wild..fornication, murder of other popes, etc. Titus and Paul would rolling in their tombs. </B><BR/>If you really want to hear the answer to your questions, there are plenty of places to look...the Catholic Answer forums are full of people, especially Catholic converts, just waiting to discuss these kinds of things. But I have a feeling you're not asking questions to hear the answers, but rather your questions are aimed at proving yourself right. I will not engage in that kind of one-sided discussion. <BR/><BR/><B>Like I've said before I've been a practicing 100% believing Catholic for many moons. I know what Catholicism teaches. In fact I've been studing more about Catholicism and the more I read in light of Scripture I know with absolute certainty that Catholicism is a false religion. I don't say this out of hatred but it is so obvious to me I can't ignore it. Any Catholic who remains in this system will never know peace in their hearts. The peace that they may feel is a false sense of security in "Mary" (not the Biblical Mary but a Satanic Mary posing as the mother of Jesus)<BR/><BR/>It's your choice to remain in Catholicism and believe it without questioning it. I however would want to know the truth about Salvation and that can be found only in Scripture. <BR/><BR/>Thank you for your time. </B>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-91931222391873462052007-04-03T15:31:00.000-05:002007-04-03T15:31:00.000-05:00What you don't seem to understand is that what you...What you don't seem to understand is that what you are saying is exactly how I started out...I USED to believe what you're saying, I used to claim the same things. Then I started to actually examine unbiased history rather than leaning on biased anti-Catholic sources, and that is how I ended up Catholic. So forgive me if I don't fall over in shock when I hear the same old anti-Catholic misconceptions I once believed myself being spouted from yet another person.<BR/><BR/>When you can respectfully and accurately explain what the Church actually teaches and why you disagree instead of leaning on straw men, then I might seriously consider taking the time to explain my POV. Until then, all I see is another anti-Catholic asking questions to prove a point, not to actually hear the answer, unwilling to deal with reality, and desperately clinging to biased misinformation and hatred for the Church. <BR/><BR/>If you really want to hear the answer to your questions, there are plenty of places to look...the Catholic Answer forums are full of people, especially Catholic converts, just waiting to discuss these kinds of things. But I have a feeling you're not asking questions to hear the answers, but rather your questions are aimed at proving yourself right. I will not engage in that kind of one-sided discussion.Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-35814279784132590042007-04-03T14:38:00.000-05:002007-04-03T14:38:00.000-05:00Once you compose yourself could you at least be ho...Once you compose yourself could you at least be honest with yourself and take a deeper look at the history of Catholicism which dates back to Constantine and not to the Apostles? <BR/><BR/>You can not trace back Catholic non-Biblical practices/beliefs to Christ or the Apostles. You can not even prove that Peter was a pope or his successor. Just saying they were doesn't make it true.<BR/><BR/>Do you trust in Christ alone for your salvation or do you trust Christ + what the Catholic Church teaches you? If the latter, do then please share with me, a former Catholic, why I should place my salvation in the hands of a religious organization where they have no evidence for their authority other than their say so? Why when I left the Catholic Church Catholics accuse me of leaving Christ and I loose my salvation?<BR/><BR/>I don't believe them or the Catholic Church because I place my faith in Christ alone for my salvation and trust God's Word over man's tradition anytime.<BR/><BR/>Left Rome for HomeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-17637628528209775922007-04-03T11:41:00.000-05:002007-04-03T11:41:00.000-05:00Lol...ok...whew, sorry, had to stop laughing so I ...Lol...ok...whew, sorry, had to stop laughing so I could see to type. <BR/><BR/>Um...yeah. www.catholic.com. Check it out. (Do a search for Dave Hunt on there and you'll get lots of great stuff.) <BR/><BR/>Again, x-Catholic, been there done that, bought the t-shirt...Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-80000826316908417062007-04-03T11:19:00.000-05:002007-04-03T11:19:00.000-05:00opps I forgot to sign off on my above post.x-Catho...opps I forgot to sign off on my above post.<BR/><BR/>x-Catholic who left Rome for HomeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-87346749429683187002007-04-03T11:09:00.000-05:002007-04-03T11:09:00.000-05:00The Super-Secret REAL Teachings of the Catholic Ch...The Super-Secret REAL Teachings of the Catholic Church <BR/>Ok fellow Catholics, it's time to fess up.<BR/><BR/>Let's all pull out our Super-Secret decoder rings, and the hidden handbook (all written in Latin so no one else can understand, of course) and admit to what we REALLY believe, but pretend not to with all those faux "official documents of the Church".<BR/><BR/><B>The truth be known is that the Vatican does indeed have secret archives.</B> <BR/><BR/>You know what we really believe...that the Pope is more important than Christ Himself, that he can change scripture all he wants and we accept it gladly. (Not quite sure why he hasn't taken out some of those pesky verses as of yet, all that "call no man father" stuff and "doctrine of demons" stuff that describes us so well!) <BR/><BR/><B>Christ says He's the Head of the church and it is Catholic teaching which declares the Pope as the Head of the Catholic church on earth. Popes believe they have to power to make up new doctrines based on Oral Traditions which they have absolutely no proof they actually came from Christ and the Apostles. Yet the so-called sacred traditions of Roman Catholicism are on equal ground with Biblical Truths. Do you have the assurance that these "sacred Traditions" roots actually came from Christ and the Apostles? No you don't but you trust in man instead of God. The Catholic Church does not even have evidence that Peter acted in the role as Pope or even his successor. Where's the evidence?</B><BR/><BR/>That Mary is above God in our eyes (since She's His Mother, after all!) <BR/><BR/><B>You haven't been Catholic long enough to realize that it is better to go through Mary than straight to Jesus. Apparently you haven't read St Louis de Montefort "Glories of Mary"</B><BR/><BR/>That reading scripture is dangerous, and we're not really allowed to unless a priest reads it to us so he can tell us what it REALLY means, especially when it seems so obviously contrary to Catholic teaching (the REAL Catholic teaching, you know).<BR/><BR/><B>In the last century or so Catholics can read the Bible but they can not interpret without the guidence of the Catholic Church. I used to do Catholic Bible studies but only with a priest and not a layperson.</B><BR/><BR/>That priests are the most powerful and magical people on Earth, and it's necessary to treat them as such. <BR/><B>Why not? They have the power to bring Jesus down from Heaven onto the altar at Mass, change bread and wine into Jesus' body and blodd, absolve you from sins, and release folks from purgatory</B><BR/><BR/>That Christ needs to bend His will in accordance with His Blessed Mother's. <BR/><BR/><B> That's in the Glories of Mary by St Louis de Montefort (Dr of the Church)</B><BR/><BR/>Come on guys...we've been outed, it's time to admit it!<BR/><BR/><B>You must read Dave Hunt's book "A Woman Rides the Beast". It fits the Roman Catholic Church to the tee. Satan's greatest deception is to draw good people away from Christ and corrupt God's Holy Word.</B>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-59011124779906434572007-03-30T23:29:00.000-05:002007-03-30T23:29:00.000-05:00Where is your evidence contrary. Seems that all yo...<EM>Where is your evidence contrary. Seems that all you can do is poke fun of the concepts without offering any kind of proof that the RCC has historically believed such things. </EM><BR/><BR/>How about the 2,00 years of assertions of faith that contradict any such beliefs? How about the total lack of church council rulings that decree such belief? Or is that not good enough?katehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01599292890685738699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-19604865302981768822007-03-29T13:17:00.000-05:002007-03-29T13:17:00.000-05:00jdavidb,And I seriously doubt you're a qualified p...jdavidb,<BR/><BR/><I>And I seriously doubt you're a qualified psychoanalyst. :)</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, I am. So, let me clarify things for you. That was not psychoanalysis. Reread his post yourself. Do you not detect the aggression? Do you really not see the attempts to shame my friend? It's right there on the page. <BR/><BR/>Superior truth will always be evidenced by superior fruit: love, gentleness, meekness, humility, and kindness. If he's going to waltz in here making such vehement accusations about our faith, he'd better be ready to defend his own. I challenged him to a fruit-check. If he really is speaking from Truth and Love, he shouldn't have ANY problem shutting down my challenge. Evidence will abound. <BR/><BR/>But more importantly, do you really not see the difference between how he speaks in here and how you do? You have behaved generously in my friend's house and I find you charming. Question her Catholicism all you like. As long as you keep up that gentle tone of yours, you will never hear a rebuke from me. He, on the other hand, is picking fights. He drew an ugly "you know you're a big fat liar" line in the sand. You don't really need my degree to see the difference, do you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-10399428624798286002007-03-29T10:38:00.000-05:002007-03-29T10:38:00.000-05:00You began with one huge mistaken assumption. That ...<I>You began with one huge mistaken assumption. That everyone reading has a sense of humor!</I><BR/><BR/>Mea culpa!Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-66265151397475931782007-03-29T08:08:00.000-05:002007-03-29T08:08:00.000-05:00Anonymous, you don't even know Mr. Kevin Cauley, s...Anonymous, you don't even know Mr. Kevin Cauley, so I find it completely unjustified for you to make such judgments about his motivations. For all you know, he does engage in whatever activities you think are necessary as a prerequisite before anyone has the right to question Catholicism.<BR/><BR/>Questioning the truth of religion, mine or someone else's, is not a wrong or hateful act. If you don't like religious dialogue, don't engage in it.<BR/><BR/>And I seriously doubt you're a qualified psychoanalyst. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-36162537953428776272007-03-28T23:45:00.000-05:002007-03-28T23:45:00.000-05:00Silly Silly Stephanie!So you just thought you'd dr...Silly Silly Stephanie!<BR/><BR/>So you just thought you'd drop in a little light hearted laugh at ourselves and maybe a soft dig at our less than charitable friends across the Tiber? You began with one huge mistaken assumption. That everyone reading has a sense of humor! <BR/><BR/>The difference between a little gentle sarcasm to gently bring to other's attention the ludicrous nature of an argument presented and a misleading and malicious criticism of our opponents in debate is not merely in the eye of the beholder. It is the difference between an Opus Dei priest pretending to call in his assassin monk to deal with his opponent in a debate about "The DaVinci Code" and that same priest loudly denouncing his opponent as a spawn of Satan for misrepresenting Catholicism.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately in defending usch things presents a catch 22. That is, if someone doesn't understand the basic rules of reasoned debate, how can you argue for those rules using reasoned debate? <BR/><BR/>Well, you can do so from Natural Law of course, but there I go being a discriminating Catholic again! Oh the shame!Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15189580002644810418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-84320922631539449792007-03-28T14:40:00.000-05:002007-03-28T14:40:00.000-05:00There's been a lot of things said about this threa...<I>There's been a lot of things said about this thread that we have, but I've seen absolutely not one shred of evidence to prove that this document is other than genuine.</I><BR/><BR/>I'd like to hear your explanation for why you WANT it to be genuine? Why do you WANT the RCC to be a lie? What does it do FOR YOU to believe that the faith of a billion people is a dangerous sham? What kind of person relishes that kind of thing? <BR/><BR/>Or don't you relish the idea? Maybe you cry for us in prayer, begging God to be merciful and forgive us 'for we know not what we do.' Do you do that? Maybe you treat every Catholic you meet with deference, meekness, kindness, humility, and gentleness of Christ, putting them before yourself in every way in an efforts to win them to a true relationship with our Lord. Do you do that too? If so, I'd sure like to hear about it. What exactly have you done out of love for us, other than ridicule and try to undermine our faith? <BR/><BR/>I'm awaiting YOUR explanation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-55755692655645858572007-03-27T22:40:00.000-05:002007-03-27T22:40:00.000-05:00It is full of heresy. That's all the proof I need....It is full of heresy. That's all the proof I need. It just makes absolutely no sense for the Church to officially declare these things as heresy for 2,000 years, and then secretly have people confess that it's true...makes no sense at all, unless you believe in the evil secret Catholic conspiracy. <BR/><BR/>I see no convincing evidence that this heretical statement is authentic, I do see that part of the document it is contained in has been proven to be a hoax started by anti-Catholics, and I see no reason to believe that it, too, is not an anti-Catholic hoax. <BR/><BR/>I mean...really, you might as well be trying to convince me that Catholics believe Jesus was a little green man from mars. It's that preposterous, which is why I give it no credibility at all, and I haven't seen any proof to the contrary. I mean it's like if I brought some book that had one out of place and strange passage that said members of the churches of Christ like to dismember small children, and then said, "Hmm...prove to me that this isn't true!" The book itself might be legit, but the passage is not.<BR/><BR/>It seems the part of the document that Mr. Schaff speaks of specifically is the part that is talking about the council of Trent. (I asked some friends who were knowledgeable in Latin to take a look at it, they said it had those weird heretical oaths, and the rest looked like a reproduction of documents from the Council of Trent.) So, it looks to me very likely that someone tried to sneak in the heretical oaths into a legitimate Catholic collection of writings, and hoped no one would notice. I mean come on...even if you think the Church is evil and deceptive, do you think they would really be stupid enough to put completely contradictory "oaths" and "confessions" into the same collection of Catholic writings? (If you'll read some of the writings from Trent, you'll notice nowhere does it say the Pope or Mary is due higher honor than God, etc.) I would think the biggest evil mastermind on Earth would be just a tad smarter than that!<BR/><BR/>It has already been shown that the KofC oath was not legit (as y'all figured out for yourselves), so it's not unlikely that this oath was snuck into the collection at the same time the other was. <BR/><BR/>Anyway...it really is just so ridiculous that it's not worth wasting any more time on. If y'all want to believe it's true, go right ahead, I can't stop you. It's no skin off my back, it's not like you have a very rosy picture of the Church to begin with, lol.Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-47531638417014697642007-03-27T21:45:00.000-05:002007-03-27T21:45:00.000-05:00Stephanie,There's been a lot of things said about ...Stephanie,<BR/><BR/>There's been a lot of things said about this thread that we have, but I've seen absolutely not one shred of evidence to prove that this document is other than genuine. Where is your evidence contrary. Seems that all you can do is poke fun of the concepts without offering any kind of proof that the RCC has historically believed such things. I, for one, am willing to listen to the evidence as to whether this document is legitimate or not. It was part of a greater document that contained the Catholic Catechism. The same document was listed by Philip Schaff in part of a listing of Catholic confessions of faith. It is, whether you like it or not, a historical Catholic document and you must explain the concepts within it some how. I, as well as many others, await your explanation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-69447847438927910852007-03-27T20:10:00.000-05:002007-03-27T20:10:00.000-05:00Party pooper.No need to resort to name-calling. H...<I>Party pooper.</I><BR/><BR/>No need to resort to name-calling. He just has a little crush on her and cares how she spends her personal time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-84969038859310264682007-03-27T19:16:00.000-05:002007-03-27T19:16:00.000-05:00There is a THIRD option, aside from getting mad or...<I>There is a THIRD option, aside from getting mad or laughing at it. . .just ignore it.</I><BR/><BR/>Party pooper.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-17539387078140389572007-03-27T16:49:00.000-05:002007-03-27T16:49:00.000-05:00People who actually make a genuine attempt to look...People who actually make a genuine attempt to look at what Catholics say they believe tend to stick out on the PF board (in a good way). ;-)Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14847605396658754483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-49815436467983240612007-03-27T15:57:00.000-05:002007-03-27T15:57:00.000-05:00Thanks, Sara. Didn't realize I was well-known eno...Thanks, Sara. Didn't realize I was well-known enough for you to think that about me. :blush:Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32523001.post-59794202380292893022007-03-27T15:56:00.000-05:002007-03-27T15:56:00.000-05:00to go and argue/discuss/inform/whatever over at PF...<I>to go and argue/discuss/inform/whatever over at PF is like trying to reason and discuss with White supremacists. (yes, PF lurkers, I used that analogy).</I><BR/><BR/>Yes, I see you, and I'm at a loss as to how you think you're somehow taking a moral high ground over this blog post.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com